Talk:Boquila
Add topic | Boquila has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 4, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | A fact from Boquila appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
I need help finding facts about Boquila
[edit]Now pls 2601:80:4300:E800:517:6BA1:452D:11D6 (talk) 22:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15592324.2021.1977530
- This article is really good
- already listed as a source on the article Wolfgang likes bugs (talk) 04:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Species name
[edit]This page spells the species name both as trifoliolata and as trifoliata. Kew lists only trifoliolata: https://powo.science.kew.org/results?q=Boquila
I am something of a newbie; I hope this note is acceptable. Can someone assure me that it would be appropriate to edit the page to reflect the information from Kew? (Thanks.) Jonsinger (talk) 19:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Changed all spellings to "trifoliolata". Plantdrew (talk) 17:15, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
"controversial" - opinion?
[edit]In the mimicry section one sentence states "In one controversial study, B. trifoliata has been noted to mimic the leaves of plastic plants." But the only citation on this is the study itself, there is no citation regarding the alleged controversy 2001:9E8:9FD:4500:9183:B842:FDDA:D3E1 (talk) 16:13, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
- A reference discussing the controversy was already cited elsewhere, but I've added it to that sentence as well. Plantdrew (talk) 17:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)