Talk:Bonus rule
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
How does one comment on bogus content?
> After the league added four new teams, the Bonus Rule was reintroduced in 1962. The difference
There are two leguages in MLB. The American League added two teams in 1961; the National League added two teams in 1962.
If you want to verify this commonly known information,check the Sporting News or any newspaper.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bonus Rule. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060604194752/http://www.scarecrowpress.com/Catalog/SingleBook.shtml?command=Search&db=%5EDB%2FCATALOG.db&eqSKUdata=0810830493 to http://www.scarecrowpress.com/Catalog/SingleBook.shtml?command=Search&db=%5EDB%2FCATALOG.db&eqSKUdata=0810830493
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 27 June 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Bonus rule. Mahveotm (talk) 10:09, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Bonus Rule → Bonus rule – Per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS; the WP:SPORTCAPS RfC; and WP:CONSISTENCY with the rest of the contents of Category:Baseball rules and Category:Baseball labor relations. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 01:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Move to Bonus rule (baseball) per "bonus rule is" GBook test In ictu oculi (talk) 07:04, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- Support nomination, but oppose bonus rule (baseball). Nothing is being disambiguated. — AjaxSmack 21:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.