Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23247d39c8c3a24

Jump to content

Talk:Body without organs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Guy Macon in topic Least comprehensible article on Wikipedia?

Merge?

[edit]

this is the same text as in the Anti-Oedipus article. Merge? - Ktai 18:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect statements?

[edit]

I am just a casual reader of Deleuze but The second last line in the piece struck me as wrong. Specifically “the full BwO” is not the healthy BwO but is completely withdrawal or “catatonic” as described in the Routledge publication ISBN 0-415-113119 {{isbn}}: Check isbn value: checksum (help)-9 at the top of page 33 in Deleuze and Guattari’s Anti-Oedipus by Eugene W. Holland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.60.21 (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, you've misunderstood Holland's point. He says that when one withdraws to the full body without organs and rejects completely the desiring machines, one becomes catatonic. The relevant text is "How do you make yourself a BwO?" in Thousand Plateaus. DionysosProteus (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Suitable egg images

[edit]

Incomprehensible

[edit]

This article needs translating into English, or possibly English-and-not-crazy. Clement Cherlin (talk) 06:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Least comprehensible article on Wikipedia?

[edit]

Is this even notable enough to deserve an article? If it is, it certainly deserves a more understandable one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.79.108 (talkcontribs) April 2, 2012

This article is now on Reddit with the title So I think I found the least comprehensible article on Wikipedia.. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

This post attempts to explain the article. --George100 (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Never have I been so tempted to replace the content of a Wikipedia article with a cut and paste from a Reddit post. <smile> --Guy Macon (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2012 (UTC)Reply