Talk:Body shaming
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 26 August 2020. The result of the discussion was restore article. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amandaerfeng.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Importance Change
[edit]Especially with the growth of social media standards and a shift in culture in general, I believe that body shaming is a pretty important topic to discuss. Thus, I have changed the importance from low to mid. Pouchwarm (talk) 03:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Children only?
[edit]'In a study of children's film and books regarding messages about the importance of appearance, media targeted toward children were heavily saturated with messages emphasizing attractiveness as an important part of relationships and interpersonal interaction.'
True, as far as it goes, but such messages are very widespread and the norm in advertising to adults. The fashion, cosmetics, 'life style' and many / most other industries present the same emphasis about attractiveness to everyone, not just to children.
Perhaps the article could be amended to describe the general picture and not just the relatively small part directed at children. 86.160.228.56 (talk) 14:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Is body shaming in the name of comedy bad
[edit]what happensure when people are body shamed in the name of comedy 124.123.69.198 (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
No sections?
[edit]This article has no sections besides body and references. Can I add a section title between the first paragraph, which reads like an article lead, and the rest of the information? I was thinking a simple "Background" section would help break it up and make it fit the style of most articles. I'm open to brainstorm a different name for it too if "Background" is not suitable here. USnoozieULoozie (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class Discrimination articles
- Mid-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- Start-Class Health and fitness articles
- Low-importance Health and fitness articles
- WikiProject Health and fitness articles
- Start-Class Human rights articles
- High-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles