Talk:Body Music

Requested move 28 July 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus DrStrauss talk 09:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

---

Body Music (album) → Body Music – None of the other songs or albums on the dab page have an article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:B000:5391:DE62:D999 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. DrStrauss talk 17:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

• • And before that, Body Music → Body Music (disambiguation),
• None of the other songs or albums on the dab page have an article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:B000:5391:DE62:D999 (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
• @2601:8C:4001:DCB9:B000:5391:DE62:D999: Queried move requests. The current Body Music is a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose this album having done reasonably well might stand out from the capitalized items on the dab page enough to be absolute topic if "body music" wasn't a well worn term with a much better known meaning. People interested in graphic novels, performance art or poetry are also not going to automatically think of this album. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

The dab page should include

• body music, or body percussion, such as slapping the thigh or chest in music
• body music, for dancing, as opposed to head music for thinking

Both of these topics get considerably more serious GBooks coverage than Body Music (AlunaGeorge album) In ictu oculi (talk) 14:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

• Support. This is the only subject of this title with an article or more than a mention at any other article. The stub Head music is a stretch to include here and probably isn't notable.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:35, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
• Support. WP:PRIMARYORONLYTOPIC. --В²C ☎ 22:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:PRIMARYORONLYTOPIC. This is an essay stub written by the user - the difference with WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is clear. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Of course WP:PRIMARYORONLYTOPIC differs from WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. It's a concept that encompasses PRIMARYTOPIC, but extends the concept to topics to which only one term refers. Since PRIMARYTOPIC only applies when a given term is ambiguous it does not apply when a given term refers to only one topic. PRIMARYORONLYTOPIC applies to a topic of a given term whether it's the PRIMARYTOPIC (per the criteria at that guideline) or it is the only topic for that term. --В²C ☎ 20:04, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

• Support per Cúchullain. This is primary by pageviews and significance. Dohn joe (talk) 15:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose per IIO. Omnedon (talk) 18:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
• Oppose. I can see how this might be the most significant or most searched-for topic by this name, but even that seems doubtful, and the chance of it meeting the PT criteria of being highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term and/or of substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term seems most unlikely. So it fails both criteria. Andrewa (talk) 08:17, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.