Talk:Blood Debts
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Votesmall in topic Reason for the ending
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2023. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blood Debts article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Reason for the ending
[edit]Does anyone have information on why the movie ends that way? I've found this discussion, but it's unsourced https://www.reddit.com/r/RedLetterMedia/comments/sia5yk/the_reason_blood_debts_ends_this_way_is_because/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rafaelmonteirocdj (talk • contribs) 22:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- This is correct. Ferdinand Marcos censored films and as a result the film ends this way. Source: "Like print and broadcast media, film was also heavily regulated during the Martial Law period. Letter of Instruction no. 13 issued on September 29, 1972, prohibited films that incite subversion and rebellion, films that glorify criminals, films that show the use of prohibited drugs, and films that undermine people's confidence in the government. It also banned films that are contrary to the spirit of Proclamation 1081."[1](Votesmall (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2025 (UTC))
References
- ↑ "Letter of Instruction No. 13, s. 1972 | GOVPH". Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. Archived from the original on March 18, 2022. Retrieved March 18, 2022.
Does this article really qualify as a stub?
[edit]It has a decent amount of info and was expanded during the AfD. — Davest3r08 >:) (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Sorry just saw your message now and that you had assessed as Start. I did assess as C. If you think it's too generous (for instance because it has no production section), feel free to restore your own assessment.
- In anyway, not a stub anymore no, you were right. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:11, 17 November 2023 (UTC)