Talk:BlackBerry KeyOne

Requested move 4 November 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move, therefore, moved. Moved per WP:MOS-TM. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:54, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

---

BlackBerry KEYone → BlackBerry KeyOne – Reliable sources refer to this device as the BlackBerry KeyOne (The Verge), BlackBerry Keyone (Wired), and BlackBerry KEYone (Engadget). Of these three styles, KeyOne most closely resembles standard English. (MOS:TM) — Newslinger talk 00:37, 4 November 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

• Oppose, as it's officially known by BlackBerry as the 'KEYone' (as seen here). VibeScepter (talk) (contributions) 18:39, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
  • From Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trademarks: "When deciding how to format a trademark, editors should examine styles already in use by independent sources. From among those, choose the style that most closely resembles standard English – regardless of the preference of the trademark owner." — Newslinger talk 05:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
    • Oppose Since when has camelcase been standard English? --JECE (talk) 23:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
• Oppose; it is currently named correctly. Steevven1 ^{(Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery)} 17:41, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
• Support KeyOne or Keyone feminist (talk) 05:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
• Page mover comment Kindly see Talk:BlackBerry KEY2#Requested move 4 November 2018 as well. These two requests should have been proposed in the same discussion. @JECE: I am not sure if you are opposing the proposed the name, or opposing the oppose. It is also suggested to participants to point to the policy/guideline according to which current or proposed title is more suitable. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
  • I'm opposing the proposed name.--JECE (talk) 19:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
• Support per MOS:TM to avoid promotional all-caps string. Whether it's "official" or not is irrelevant. Lots of companies use excessive capitalization to try to call attention to themselves and their products, and Wikipedia absolutely should not do that. Regarding the comment by JECE, I think mixed case is pretty standard when mashing words together for tech product names. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
• Support move (in agreement with BarrelProof above), preferring "KeyOne". --Woofboy (talk) 04:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
• Support per WP:MOS-TM. Dekimasuよ! 20:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.