Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22667b57aeaa0d6

Jump to content

Talk:Bispectrum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 months ago by ~2026-31047-02 in topic Poor definition

Poor definition

[edit]

I'm not sure what the bispectrum is, but the explanation here is poorly written.

1. It is defined here in terms of cumulants, itself a concept whose WP article doesn't promise clarity. (If I were interested in cumulants, perhaps it would be more useful, I can't say. But that's not my current interest.)

2. If I understand correctly, the bispectrum of 2 signals (f,g) is, precisely, cov(f+g,f*g), where "*" = convolution and "cov" = covariance (i.e., correlation x product of standard deviations). Is this true? If so, it would be much more helpful to define it that way before explaining its relation to cumulants and its computation by Fourier transform.

It would be especially helpful to explain the underlying intuition, i.e., how it encodes information that, say, EEG analysts have found to be meaningful, or why one might turn to bispectra when studying certain kinds of related signals. Jmacwiki (talk) 20:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the low rating for the article. If you want to learn about higher order spectra in general (including bispectrum) have a look at the article polyspectra and references there. ~2026-31047-02 (talk) 20:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply