Talk:Birmingham Bulls
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by JHunterJ in topic Requested move 10 July 2019
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 10 July 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved per page views criterion (no arguments for long-term significance were presented). -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
– No primary topic, this one gets 782 views while all of the "Birmingham Bulls" teams get 1,540 views, meaning the others get 758 views (nearly as many) and there is a bit of a jump on the 26th for the WHA one, while on most days Birmingham Bulls (SPHL) gets nearly as many. Target is consistant with WP:NCIH#Teams, the others in Category:World Hockey Association teams and de:Birmingham Bulls (WHA). Birmingham Bulldogs also gets 67 views []. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Page views isn't the only metric about primary topic. And even if we do use the page views this one has 50% of the views whereas the remaining 4 or 5 pages make up the other 50% which means this one clearly gets the most page views by a magnitude of 5x. I think its pretty clear that the majority of people looking for this topic are looking for this team. -DJSasso (talk) 11:12, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- No recommendation. I'd consider the SPHL team for the primary entry since the team is extant. On the other hand, the ECHL (league) page gets nearly twice as many views as the WHA page, which gets twice as many as the SPHL page, which gets several times more than the CPHL page, if anyone wants to make that a factor. --Dystopos (talk) 13:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Sorry, but 50% isn't nearly enough for a primary topic. Birmingham Bulls (SPHL) regularly gets just as many views as the undisambiguation Birmingham Bulls, so I don't think it's clear at all that people on Birmingham Bulls really wanted that article. --Quiz shows 16:59, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.