Talk:Birgeria
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge proposal
| The content of Birgeriidae was merged into Birgeria on 3 January 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Birgeria article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge proposal
[edit]Rather than merging Birgeriidae to Birgeria (which seems the wrong way around anyway), given that we have two levels of monotypy, I suggest merging both to the order Birgeriformes. Klbrain (talk) 20:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- We usually keep the genus level articles rather than the higher level ones when there are several levels of monotypy in prehistoric taxa. FunkMonk (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks; that makes sense.
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks; that makes sense.
Categories:
- Stub-Class Fishes articles
- Low-importance Fishes articles
- WikiProject Fishes articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/April 2008
- Accepted AfC submissions
