Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a257127e1bc2bd4a

Jump to content

Talk:Bioherbicide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pahulmeet. Peer reviewers: Fei Wade, Lupitaf.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

[edit]

This is about horticulture rather than toxicology - and in any case could be merged with biopesticide. Roy Bateman (talk) 13:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

[edit]

I would suggest adding specific examples of the usage of bioherbicides. For example, who in the agriculture industry use bioherbicides, and with what crops have these bioherbicides been tested. Adding background information, for example, first dates used would also add relevant information to the article.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Lupitaf (talkcontribs) 05:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Classification

[edit]

I have posted a question https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk#What_can_I_do_about_it_when_this_page_is_miscategorized_badly:_bioherbicide_?_it_isn't_medical_toxicology. so I hope to get this fixed soon.

Organization and Writing of the Article - Criticism

[edit]

After attempting to read the article closely, I have the following criticisms:

  • The sentences are dense and cover a lot of ground, with little detail provided.
  • Most of the references don't seem focused on the statements they are assigned to - There's one I can fix, where the sentence is about various kinds of bioherbicides, but the reference is clearly about fungi, from its title. I need to sort through the rest as best I can without knowing the sources - I think I can find the abstracts.
  • The organization of sections is inconsistent with the overall pattern of the text - it seems the writer wrote an essay with the main topic being about the marketing and the market for bioherbicides, and then inserted arbitrary section headers independently of that. (Maybe similar to what happened with the references.)

I may be exaggerating. I will try to patch it up. Help would be appreciated. Thinkadoodle (talk) 03:55, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I reorganized the sections into a slightly more logical order, but you're right - lots more needs to happen here. Retswerb (talk) 04:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply