Talk:Bioaerosol

This article includes a very long reference list, but very little content. The reference list should be trimmed to include only those references actually used. --148.208.179.155 17:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Any reference added without a clear indication of where it was used should be removed. --Ronz 16:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Although I know what ACGIH is, I suggest that its definition be included - American Conference of Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.147.52.36 (talk) 10:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Amount of references and "citation needed" tags

I noticed that in the very original version of this page, there were many references listed that were not properly cited inline. Now, there seems to be quite a few "Citation needed" tags and for the amount of information that is on the page, 3 references doesn't seem like enough. Where did this information come from if there are only 3 references? Based on the previous comments on the talk page, I don't think the issue was the lengthy references section and I don't believe the solution was to remove the majority of them. I think what should have been done was to correctly cite the references into the article.

Kchang99 (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Victorian gentleman was the first person ever to observe dust on the wind.

"Charles Darwin was the first to observe the transport of dust particles"

The genius of the white man never ceases to amaze, we of the lesser races are forever blessed that after a hundred millenia, a white victorian gentleman was available to inform us that wind can carry dust. ~2026-39734-40 (talk) 11:20, 15 July 2026 (UTC)