Talk:Binary relation
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing Binary relation and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| The content of Coreflexive relation was merged into Binary relation on October 9, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Inconsistent Definition of Bijective
[edit]The definition of a bijective relation on this page is that it is injective and surjective. This would allow the relation R: {a,b} x {u,v,w} where aRu, aRv, and bRw. However, this page then says "In other words, every element of the domain has exactly one image element and every element of the codomain has exactly one preimage element", which would not allow R. Those statements are equivalent only for injective and surjective *functions*. Which definition is true? ~2026-30270-13 (talk) 12:11, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
- Where did you find that definition? The article defines
- (in paragraph "Uniqueness properties":) injective relation,
- (in paragraph "Totality properties":) surjective relation,
- (in paragraph "Uniqueness and totality properties":) injective function, surjective function, bijective function.
- I now indented the latter 3 definitions to emphasize that they are subcases of functions. Your example is not covered by any of these definitions; it may be valuable as a counterexample demonstrating why no notion of bijective relation (intended as a proper genenralization of bijective function) can be defined. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 13:20, 20 May 2026 (UTC)