Talk:Binary matrix
Add topicLatest comment: 15 years ago by Cliff in topic Merger proposal
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The content of the Binary matrix page was merged into Logical matrix on February 2011, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history. |
the article is so small! --achab 21:52, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
?
[edit]
Presumably this is a generalisation of . Is this standard notation? If it is, I wouldn't have thought that it's valid to equate it to GF(2), because one is a set, the other a field. Oli Filth 03:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]As far as I know, these two terms (Binary matrix and Logical matrix) both refer to the same thing, a matrix of any size where the entries are restricted to (0,1). Is there a distinction I'm missing? Otherwise, these two articles should be merged. jheiv talk contribs 23:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
Merger completed Cliff (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)