Talk:Biloxi language
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Mo-Al in topic Comment
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]1. You should tell a bit more about the livelihood of the speakers of this language.
2. It needs to be explained why the grammar you are using was written several dozen years after the last native speaker had died. You should address the sources available on this language in general.
3. If possible, you could say some words about the classification of the language. G Purevdorj (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. I'll add this info to the article. To make things clear, the reason I'm using Einaudi is because she is basing her analysis on a number of different sources (Dorsey, Matthews, Haas) who my impression is all only give part of the big picture and have their own inconsistencies. Mo-Al (talk) 20:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- Mid-importance Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America articles
- C-Class language articles
- Unknown-importance language articles
- WikiProject Languages articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Louisiana articles
- Low-importance Louisiana articles
- WikiProject Louisiana articles
- Louisiana articles with to-do lists
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia pages with to-do lists
