Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a240712d2e15f3c9

Jump to content

Talk:Big Boy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Box73 in topic Big Boy Restaurant descriptors

Big Boy Restaurant descriptors

[edit]

Writing concise, accurate descriptors for the Big Boy restaurant entries is difficult. There are several reasons.

First is that Big Boy is actually a chain of regional chains or franchises.

Second is that Big Boy Restaurants, the primary article, must define both the current owner, Big Boy Restaurants International, and Big Boy historically, which had many more restaurants and covered much more of the US and Canada.

Another complicating factor is the franchise names and relationships. When Elias Brothers bought the Big Boy parent from Marriott, there were intentions to phase out franchise names. When Liggett (the current owner aka Big Boy Restaurants International) bought out Elias Brothers, all the Elias Brothers Big Boys simply became Big Boy. Other franchises resisted.

The other complication has to do with Frisch's. Frisch's made a deal to operate exclusively and independently of Liggett. It isn't apparent to the general public as both continue to use the same trademark, offer common menu items and maintain exclusive territories. However there are no franchise fees or royalties, no licensing, no franchisor/franchisee relationship. This creates terrible confusion. It isn't true or fair to say Big Boy Restaurants = Big Boy Restaurants International and ignore Frisch's. So I choose to say "Frisch's is a Big Boy franchise" in a common sense but not (no longer) a franchisee.

Lastly, comes Bob's Big Boy. Bob's was the original Big Boy, the original parent in a sense. Now it is a franchisee (or actually a collection of franchised owner/operators sharing the regional name). The Bob's name is so strong that Liggett these California units to remain as Bob's Big Boy (and offer a somewhat distinct menu).

The point is that over time the relationships have changed dramatically, and descriptions must be fuzzy to accommodate this.

A new issue... One must consider whether operating restaurant chains that were at one time affiliated with Big Boy, which have existing Wikipedia articles, should be listed here. Namely Shoney's Big Boy and Eat'n Park Big Boy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Box73 (talkcontribs) 23:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)Reply