Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24c8d008a58d96e

Jump to content

Talk:BibleProject

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by HistoryTheorist in topic Review of the article

Existing references on Wikipedia

[edit]

There are at least ten references on Wikipedia to this organization which could link to this page:

I think many of these are actually using references from The Bible Project website.--CNMall41 (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

COI disclosure

[edit]

Bdt2hw (talk) 19:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Past or present employer. Thank you for your support in writing an objective article.

Review of the article

[edit]

Hello fellow editors, I reviewed the Bible Project article thoroughly and paid close attention to potential issues such as biased language, promotional content, or unsupported claims. I also compared the content with the provided sources to ensure the information is accurate and properly cited. Based on my review, I did not find any notable concerns that would violate Wikipedia's content policies. I believe the article meets the guidelines and is presented from a neutral point of view. I would appreciate any further input from the community and would like to discuss the possibility of removing the COI tag. Thank you. Veteranbv (talk) 00:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply


Glenn Shrom typing: I see no editorial bias in the wording of the article. Additionally, I know of zero examples of unbiased additional information that could round out the content presented here already. I am familiar with the Bible Project, and I follow any news articles about them. No scandals about them as an organization, or anything like that. Numerous disagreements (not from me) about their theology that I don't think are relevant to Wikipedia's mission. It is my hope also that the COI tag would removed, and I thought that perhaps by typing something here, the COI removal suggestion could get revisited. It's been over a year since the previous post. I don't care if my post gets deleted, just wanted a revisit. I'm not much of a contributing member, and don't mind my two cents perspective being generally ignored. After all, I didn't go to the trouble of following talk page guidelines, so you have every right to delete this.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:987:C100:5A40:54F1:ED96:997F:239 (talk) 19:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have read the article and find no need for the tag. I am happy to remove it, however, I will wait a bit in case of any new responses. XZealous (talk) 06:57, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
I do follow what BibleProject is doing and listen to some of their podcasts, but I concur that it does not read as an advertisement nor does it have any blatant COI violations. Not going to remove the tag myself because I appreciate their work, but those are my two cents. (TLDR: It doesn't need the orange tag) ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 18:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply