Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24113f67c0d3334

Jump to content

Talk:Bhil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Durjan Singh Jadon in topic Bhil state history
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bhil people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Image

[edit]

Please note the comments here regarding the insertion of a different image at the head of this article. I've reverted the change of image a few times now, and at least one other person has also done the same thing. - Sitush (talk) 21:06, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


In the book 'we were Adivasis' by megan moodie it is mentioned that dhankas is subtribe of the bheel tribe. And many other sources proves that dhanka was a martial tribe. Sources - Bihar the heart of india, Gupta

Question regarding edit deleted on 17 August 2022

[edit]
  1. Meenas are also a sub-group of Bhils.[1]
  1. According to Pramod Kumar, the word Bhil or Bhilada was used for the Meenas.[2]


References

  1. Sezgin, Yuksel (2011). Human Rights and Legal Pluralism. ISBN 9783643999054.
  2. Kumar, Pramod (1984). Folk Icons and Rituals in Tribal Life. Abhinav. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-8-17017-185-0.

Bhil history

[edit]

Bhils have been described in a very derogatory manner. The Kolis were said to be superior to the Bhils and the Bhil caste was considered inferior. Prashant Ram Kumar ji (talk) 15:56, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bhil state history

[edit]

How can you say that the British article is not reliable? The most reliable history of India has been written by the British. If you do not consider the British source to be reliable then remove the British source from the entire Wikipedia. This is a very foolish argument that the British source is not reliable.The British ruled India for four hundred years. During this period, the British recorded all the activities taking place in the country in history and in any case, Indian historians did not write the history of the tribals.When the Bhil kings ruled during the British rule, the people in power in the country were writing the history of the tribals during that period and if I am adding the same reference, what is your problem? Please Bring back the part of this article that you removed BhiRaaj (talk) 02:07, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

See WP:RAJ! Thank you Durjan Singh Jadon (talk) 02:42, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply