Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a226620da9adcf3e

Jump to content

Talk:Beyond Chutzpah

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Discussion of improvements to this article

[edit]

See the message in the tagged talkheader above. This is not a place for parking unsigned comments or long quotations. It is a place to discuss improvements to the article on the subject (the book). If one wants to compose a "Wikiquote" page, one needs to do that in Wikiquote. After creating a "Wikiquote" page, it can be added to the article simply by placing inserting a Wikiquote template (the word "Wikiquote" within two curved brackets on either side). Please sign and date comments. --NYScholar 03:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Controversial topic?

[edit]

I was browsing through the controversial topic category and noticed this article is on here. I also noticed the talk page has a total of three edits, one of which is a minor edit... is this really a controversial issue? .V. [Talk|Email] 02:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Controversy can be established by googling for the book name or reading its reviews on Amazon. The Sign of Four 16:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC) The link to the Dershowitz-Finkelstein affair at the bottom of the article gives the quickest explanation on why this is considered a controversial topic. The Sign of Four 12:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

MEJ Review

[edit]

does anyone have access to the Marc Saperstein MEJ review of the book? it should make for a nice addition here. 132.66.84.170 (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Finkelstein on the Book

[edit]

Is this section a quote from somewhere or what?Prezbo (talk) 07:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Categories of criticism

[edit]

Possible categorisations of this book include:

  • Category:Books critical of Israel
  • Category:Books critical of Zionism

either or both depending on content.
I personally interpret the categories as follows:

  • the first category as relating to criticisms of actions of the state of Israel
  • the second category as relating to criticisms of support for the existence of a Jewish homeland.

The book was originally placed in "Category:Books critical of Zionism" and I made the contested decision to move it to "Category:Books critical of Israel". There are "see also" links between the two category pages.
How would the book best be categorised? Gregkaye (talk) 00:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply


German Translation

[edit]

a German translation was published in 2006, see the entry in the German National Library: http://d-nb.info/977887731 --Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Beyond Chutzpah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:54, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply