Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject EastEnders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the popular BBCsoap operaEastEnders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EastEndersWikipedia:WikiProject EastEndersTemplate:WikiProject EastEndersEastEnders
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I am wondering if Bex Fowler should be restored into it's previous list entry. The article is very messy and would take a lot of work to bring it in line with the manual of style, there are issues with the tone and sourcing issues. There is a large plot section which is way too long, it makes the article nearly all plot. Information taken from elsewhere. The main issue it was created by a confirmed sock puppet of Trinitydivine who has been causing major disruption to EastEnders articles. I really do think Bex should have an article since she is clearly notable but this is not really doing the subject any justice. If it were that everyone would like it to remain - could the entire plot section be ripped out or condensed down completely?Rainthe 122:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I am unsure. Bex is absolutely 100% notable but my main concern is the fact that information was taken without any attribution. I am wondering if it a case of recreating the article, but I am unsure as I think it can be saved. I would work on it but I am quite busy with other projects so it would take a bit of time. But I am happy to help DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
