Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a232552aea35a0ea

Jump to content

Talk:Betsygate

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 212.219.249.5 in topic Clean up lies

2007 comments

[edit]

Surely should be integrated with Iain Duncan Smith article? 82.69.28.55 21:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Clean up lies

[edit]

The article says: "Vindication and exoneration. A report from a Parliamentary watchdog cleared IDS of any wrongdoing: The Commissioner "found no evidence that Duncan Smith made improper claims under the Additional Costs Allowance in respect of his home". However, he found that a significant proportion of Mrs Duncan Smith's work, and that paid to Miss Annabelle Eyre and Mrs Christine Watson in their roles of Private Secretary to the Leader of the Opposition "would more appropriately have been funded out of Short Money than out of the Parliamentary Staffing Allowance. Nevertheless, it was accepted that there was an absence of definition of key terms meaning that members had no guidance to scope their two allowances. The Commons Standards Committee found that IDS's arrangements “were not ideal” and that no rules had been broken.[2]"

This simply isn't true. IDS was condemed by the committee's findings. Money was misused. the whole thing is biased in favour of IDS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.249.5 (talk) 18:25, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply