Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a248de207e065645

Jump to content

Talk:Berlin Papyrus Collection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by HurricaneZeta in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HurricaneZeta (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Papyrus Berlin 25239
Papyrus Berlin 25239
Created by WatkynBassett (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 31 past nominations.

WatkynBassett (talk) 11:25, 2 November 2025 (UTC).Reply

    New enough (created Nov. 1, nom Nov. 2); long enough (8,658 characters/1356 words); well-sourced with scholarly publicaitons. Both hooks are short, interesting and sourced. Two QPQs done. I've made several small corrections to the text. I'm unsure about the image and whether it is actually PD, because it's indicated to have come from lsaclassics.com. --Երևանցի talk 09:36, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

    • @Yerevantsi: Thank you very much for your helpful edits and the review. I would consider this image to be PD because the papyrus itself is obviously old enough and it is Commons policy to accept that the process of scanning does not add the required level of originality to make it itself copyrightable. But we will not have to worry about that as I have since located an image of the papyrus which has a compatible licence and uploaded it. I have taken the liberty to change the image above accordingly and will do so in the article. WatkynBassett (talk) 22:29, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
    Looks good! --Երևանցի talk 13:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply