Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25e734bfb4cb40c

Jump to content

Talk:Bergman space

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Sławomir Biały in topic Question

Question

[edit]

what is alpha?

It appears to be notation. It would be worthwhile to explain if the notation stands for anything. Anyone know?
I corrected the expression for the norm. Now it includes an alpha.
Finally, the formula seems to be actually correct. Although now it only includes non-weighted Bergman-Spaces. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.0.192.198 (talk) 13:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
traditionally refers to the standard, unweighted, Bergman space. So there was never actually any error with the formula. See, for instance, Aleman, A.; Richter, S.; Sundberg, C., "Beurling's Theorem for the Bergman space", Acta Mathematica, 177 (2): 275–310, doi:10.1007/BF02392623. A separate section on weighted Bergman spaces may be warranted, but the unweighted ones seem to be by far the more commonly-studied ones, so the focus on these in a stub like this is appropriate. Sławomir Biały (talk) 13:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)Reply