Talk:Benjamin Truman
Add topic | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 20, 2022. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biography assessment rating comment
[edit]WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
[edit]This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum caution and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform the project members on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
DNA analysis
[edit]The claim has been inserted deailing with the Richard III DNA study. However, it is information that had no noteworthy relevance to Benjamin. Richard lived 300 years earlier, and there is no reason to believe the remote relationship of Benjamin's wife to that king's maternal grandfather played any role in Benjamin Truman's selection of a wife or in their role in society. Likewise, that a descendant of this particular line of descent happened to volunteer to have their DNA tested 200 years after Truman lived, tells us nothing of Benjamin's life or helps the reader understand Truman better. It is nothing but 21st century happenstance, no more worthy of mentioning than anything else an otherwise non-notable descendant of Benjamin might have done to get their names reported. THe information is an injudicious use of an WP:PRIMARY source, and inconsistent with WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Agricolae (talk) 13:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)