Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24623197cc2122e

Jump to content

Talk:Ben Day process

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 2A02:AA1:1609:691:F058:FDB9:8F0F:D8EA in topic So wrong

The image demonstrates halftoning and not benday dots (according to the article itself). Can anyone produce a corrected image?

Image

[edit]

Added an image I created in Photoshop to demonstrate the approximate concept

--John-Nash 08:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

So wrong

[edit]

Most of this article is superficial and wrong. It doesn't even begin to explain how the process actually worked and what it could achieve. One of the defining characteristics of the original benday process as used into the 1940's is that the pattern (not necessarily dots) could be varied considerably by the technician, using an adjustable frame, repeated applications with slight registration changes and varying pressure in the application stylus. In skilled hands it was an extremely sophisticated process, yielding continuous-tone effects, and not that far removed in principle from pressure-sensitive tablet technology today.

For details, see this extremely detailed blog series: https://legionofandy.com/2013/06/03/roy-lichtenstein-the-man-who-didnt-paint-benday-dots/ 2A02:AA1:1609:691:F058:FDB9:8F0F:D8EA (talk) 21:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply