Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2299910993890ce

Jump to content

Talk:Bell polynomials

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Touchard polynomials

[edit]

I just noticed that exponential polynomials redirects to Touchard polynomials, but exponential polynomial redirects to Bell polynomials. From what I can tellm the two are closely related, but the relationship is not really spelled out. Can someone who knows more a) make the redirect unambiguous (and as specific as possible) and b) take whatever other measures are useful? Should the articles possibly be merged? Thanks! --Stephan Schulz 09:19, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've just redirected exponential polynomial to Touchard polynomials. Michael Hardy 14:42, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've added an explanation that Touchard polynomials are simply complete Bell polynomials with all arguments being x. Maxal (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Revert

[edit]

I've reverted this edit because it left the article worse. The two section headings involved were supposed to be WITHIN the "applications" section, as subsections. Michael Hardy (talk) 11:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Recurrence relation for partial exponential Bell polynomials

[edit]

Currently, the recurrence formula for the partial exponential Bell polynomials has the form

.

I suggest to instead rewrite it in the equivalent, yet slightly more elegant form

.

This is certainly a matter of taste, but I believe that the latter form provides better insight on the involved combinatorics. It is also more consistent with with the recurrence relation given above for the complete exponential Bell polynomials, namely

.

In addition, consistently with the above formula and the rest of the article, it might be preferable to include the arguments of the partial polynomials, eventually giving

.

I'm doing the edit, please let me know or revert it is you think this is not suitable. Loj19 (talk) 20:54, 17 August 2023 (UTC)Reply