Talk:Behavioral cusp
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]The validity of this stuff? Anyone knowledgeable about this stuff think its valid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.42.44.135 (talk) 04:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
√== Interesting ==
This is an interesting concept. Well done for writing it! Can you please add, in the leading paragraph, a summary of what a behavioural cusp actually is? The paragraph describes what it isn't and related issues. Also, the formatting could be tidied up, especially "The following properties are special features"... --- Rixs (talk) 10:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Right, I've put my money where my mouth is, and done that already. --- Rixs (talk) 10:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
This is not accurate at all. I'm not even sure where most of these ideas came from. Check it against the peer reviewed journal article on the topic! http://seab.envmed.rochester.edu/jaba/articles/1997/jaba-30-03-0533.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.0.32.66 (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)