Talk:Beautiful Fighting Girl/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 11:51, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 23:56, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 23:56, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

The nominator is the top author according to XTools. There appear to be no copyright violations or plagiarism. Images appear to be licensed appropriately, and the non-free image has a solid non-free use rationale. Images are relevant to the subject of the article. Subject is notable, based on what I find in Google, Google Books, Google Scholar, Internet Archive Scholar, JSTOR, Gale, ProQuest, Project MUSE, Wiley Online Library, and Oxford Academic. I formatted the ISBNs. The article appears to be broad, neutral, and stable despite its recency. The prose appears to be strong. A more detailed review may be forthcoming, but I should be able to fix any issues I come across myself. Z. Patterson (talk) 00:35, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

@Generalissima: The article also appears to have no original research. Any corrections that were needed were easy, so I was WP:BOLD and fixed them myself. I am passing this as a good article. Z. Patterson (talk) 12:39, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.