Talk:Beachhead
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
I think we should merge the beachhead, bridgehead, and airhead articles into lodgement, since all are basically the same thing, just different subtypes differed by how they're conquered. Night Gyr 02:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. They are not the same thing and the tactics and methods of fighting them are different. For example see the difference between the use of airheads by the Chindits and the French at Dien Bien Phu. This is very different from the use of an airhead in Operation Market Garden, which was of course a bridehead. --Philip Baird Shearer 23:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Awkward number
[edit]
Two famous examples in which the attackers failed to expand their beachheads before the defending side could bring up reinforcements ...
Probably the attackers should be singular here, to match the singular defenders (or is the attack always plural, for reasons of morale?).
To my eye the plurality here resides exclusively in more than one example being given, unless the engagement itself has a plurality of attackers or a plurality of defenders (but isn't that nuance too complicated to express in rolled up form?) — MaxEnt 15:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)