Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24f31482d28c69c

Jump to content

Talk:Be Sweet to Me

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination
Good articleBe Sweet to Me has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2026Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 5, 2026.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the title of Violet Grohl's debut album Be Sweet to Me began as an in-joke between her and her best friend?

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Converted from a redirect by Zmbro (talk) and Chchcheckit (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

zmbro (talk) (cont) 15:43, 5 June 2026 (UTC).Reply

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Expanded within the 7 day window (28 May had 31 words, versus the present 1600+). High copyvio reading is from cited quotes. My advice would be not just pasting quotes, but cutting them down and rephrasing in your own words. Due to the high reading, I feel like you guys need to cut down on the quotes; e.g. you don't need the full quote of her saying it's an injoke, just say she said it was an injoke. @Zmbro and Chchcheckit: jolielover♥talk 11:00, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

*gal also i haven't written much of the prose here but yes agreed // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:07, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
...I'm also a "gal", I consider and use "guys" in a gender-neutral way jolielover♥talk 12:53, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
That's definitely on me, I started to wonder if it was too quote heavy. I'll do some paraphrasing and report back to you! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 16:04, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Jolielover I apologize for the delay. How's it look now? Last time I checked, the detector was picking up simple things like studios and album titles rather than full quotes. – zmbro (talk) (cont) 14:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Jolielover I condensed and reworded some quotes. I re-checked the copyvio detector and we should be good to go now! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 21:04, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks a bunch! Passed; lot less quotes now. jolielover♥talk 05:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Be Sweet to Me/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Zmbro (talk · contribs) 21:07, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 11:41, 7 June 2026 (UTC)Reply


Hi! I will be reviewing this article for WP:GABD, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Comments

[edit]
Be Sweet to Me (as of this rev)

Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Zmbro: that's all I got, ping me when you're done addressing these.. Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Vestrian24Bio Thanks for reviewing! Everything is all set. Let me know if you have any other questions or concerns! – zmbro (talk) (cont) 18:23, 14 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Source spot-check

[edit]
Reference #LetterSourceArchiveStatusNotes
Background
Violet Grohl said in an interview that she does not care about her status as a nepo baby:
2athefortyfive.comweb.archive.org Good
Recording
Grohl did not play any instruments on the album, saying that she felt shy and outclassed by the skilled musicians around her.
15athemusic.com.auweb.archive.org Good
The first song recorded was "Thum",
9bkerrang.comweb.archive.org Good
Composition
She said in a statement: "There's something so powerful about that period of music, from the messaging to the visuals, it's authentic and raw."
11crollingstone.comweb.archive.org Good
Grohl explained that because she often used visual and symbolic imagery in her music, her songs combined her love of cinema and music.
15fthemusic.com.auweb.archive.org Good
Release and promotion
and "Cool Buzz" on April 28.
30nme.comweb.archive.org Good
To promote the album, Grohl conducted interviews with numerous publications across America, Europe, and Asia. These included Consequence,
18cconsequence.netweb.archive.org Good
RockUrLife,
24crockurlife.netweb.archive.org Good
Critical reception
Erlewine similarly praised Grohl's vocals, saying she successfully adapted to different musical styles.
22dErlewine, Stephen Thomas (July 2026). "Filter Albums". Mojo. No. 392. p. 89. Good
Notes
Attributed to multiple references:
23dallmusic.comweb.archive.org Good
19dclashmusic.comweb.archive.org Good
25cloudersound.comweb.archive.org Good
37bexclaim.caweb.archive.org Good
22cErlewine, Stephen Thomas (July 2026). "Filter Albums". Mojo. No. 392. p. 89. Good
@Zmbro: all good in spot-check. Vestrian24Bio 10:46, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Final review

[edit]

Vestrian24Bio 10:51, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Zmbro... Vestrian24Bio 10:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Vestrian24Bio 10:51, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.