Talk:Bayesian approaches to brain function
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bayesian approaches to brain function article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I do not see the references displaying, have I done something wrong? Jockocampbell (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Please disregard the above, I found the solution. Jockocampbell (talk) 17:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Currently free energy approaches get dramatically too much cover - they present a small part of the community studying Bayesian Brain.
Also I would propose renaming this page "Bayesian approaches to Brain function" and have Bayesian brain forward to that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koerding (talk • contribs) 09:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
- Make it Bayesian approaches to brain function and I'm in favor (no cap for "brain"). Regarding the rest, I think you should feel free to edit the article in whatever way you think improves it. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Can we have a citation to go with the statement that Friston worked on free energy in the 1990s? As it stands the oldest citation is from the mid 2ks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.149.74 (talk • contribs)
The first reference, "Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science." should be attributed to Andy Clark. It seems references are generated by a template, so I cannot do this manually. --Ssanaul (talk) 23:43, 7 January 2019 (UTC)