Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a259337c7e785a3a

Jump to content

Talk:Battle sled

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by BarrelProof in topic Amount of use

Early Feedback

[edit]

Can this page be rewritten in English? 2600:8805:3804:F500:9990:42B1:2BAA:5917 (talk) 03:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Reliable sources

[edit]
  • If a photo of a porpoise sledge in use in 1944, is not a reliable source, I am done here.
  • If a Russian book on a Russian sled is not a reliable source, I am done here.

I will let others have the page. Telecine Guy (talk) 00:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

What is the source of the photograph? Who took it? Where was it taken? How do we know it was taken in 1944? How do we know what it is showing? How do we know the sled was used in WW2? We need more than just a photograph.
Regarding the book citation, a scan or an excerpt from that source would go a long way. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 02:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Removed photo of porpoise sledge:(a number of refs have also been removed)Telecine Guy (talk)
United Kingdom ammunition Porpoise sledge at Normandy landings

Amount of use

[edit]

The lead section of the article says they were used by multiple combatants. But, reading the body of the article, I don't get the impression they were used very much by anyone. Several of the described uses were just tests, not widespread deployments. Were these in common use by any military? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply