Talk:Battle of Sari Bair

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Sari Bair article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Turkey Mid‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: South Pacific / British / European / Ottoman / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Ottoman military history task force
	World War I task force

Australia: Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal Battle of Sari Bair is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance

	This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum and Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 6, 2004.

Lack Turkish POW

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This battle was the ending point of the campaign and had important political effects. Yet it lacks the Turkish point of view just like all the other Dardanelles battles. Throughout the article only British Empire actions are told while Turkish forces are explained with a couple of words or short sentences. Whoever wrote this article needs to be fair with both sides of the battle. When one reads this, it sounds like the British lost the battle by itself. Nothing is known about what the Turkish have done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.231.158.66 (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

references

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pasted in a list of references ready to use for citations. Added a Footnote section.Keith-264 (talk) 14:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected for 2 weeks

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Articles is semi-protected for a couple of weeks to stop persistent sockpuppetry from one editor. Apologies to any new contributor prevented from making legitimate edits to the article while this protection lasts; please feel free to post those legitimate edit suggestions here instead along with the edit request template. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Battle of Sari Bair

Lack Turkish POW

references

Semi-protected for 2 weeks