Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25a44950f8ec78f

Jump to content

Talk:Battle of Kilrush

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 78.18.201.8 in topic Small skirmish?

Referencing

[edit]

Any objections to changing the citation system to reflist in the hope of encouraging more refs with the more common format? RashersTierney (talk) 01:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Small skirmish?

[edit]

Show us any other battles in Ireland in the 1640s involving 11,000 men that are described as skirmishes, never mind as "small" skirmishes.78.17.23.211 (talk) 15:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

I am the editor who rewrote the article and used the words "small skirmish." It was my impression that the battle really didn't last too long. The Confederates blocked the path of the Royalists but broke fairly quickly when the Royalist cavalry attacked. So I wanted to characterize it as a skirmish rather than a formal battle where the two sides faced each other across a field attacking with artillery and fighting it out for a prolonged priod. I may hav downplayed it too much. Change it if you like. Thanks for asking. VFF0347 (talk) 16:18, 22 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

It was a battle in terms of the numbers involved, but more so from the strategic effect if the only royalist field army had been surrounded and destroyed at Kilrush. Ormonde's army had reached Maryborough (now Portlaoise) unopposed, and carried supplies as far afield as Borris in Carlow and Birr in Offaly. This had maintained royalist morale across the midlands, that would have collapsed a year earlier than it did (in 1643). Ormonde's enemies were unable to oppose his army in February 1642, when it took Naas, and so they had to destroy it on its return to Dublin, but failed.78.18.201.8 (talk) 13:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Reply