Talk:Battle of Asiago
Add topicLatest comment: 20 years ago by Lumberjack steve in topic Untitled
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Asiago article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Totally untrue. The Italian First Army was backed by the Fifth Army and did not suffer such a crushing defeat as it seems in this stub. I'm actually writing a complete article on Italian-language Wikipedia about the Battle of Asiago (or Battle of the Uplands, as it was called by Italian historians). I'll surely translate it, if somebody's ready to fix my edits into correct written English. it:Utente:Lohe
- I slightly edited the page, which was in fact inaccurate.
- A more comprehensive information on this battle would be useful.
- Looking forward to it Giordaano 10:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well done, Giordaano. I'll start translating my article within two weeks. It'll need serious grammar and lexicon fixing, but I'm sure English speakers won't feel too much annoying to give me a hand. Thanks for now. it:Utente:Lohe
A photo of the monument at Asiago woulod be good here Lumberjack Steve 09:53, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class Italian military history articles
- Italian military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- Start-Class Pritzker Military Library-related articles
- Low-importance Pritzker Military Library-related articles