Talk:Batterygate
Add topic| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Inaccurate weasel word in opening
[edit]“supposedly in order to prolong their battery life”
The update did just that; by reducing the speed of the handful of outdated devices, Apple increased the use time of the devices. It is equally documented that the reduced performance did as much. Batterygate is not that the performance was reduced to extend use time; but rather, that they did not make it clear to users what they did. Lostinlodos (talk) 22:29, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Weight lift
[edit]Greetings, all. The lead section of the article seems overly weighted towards the view that Apple's responsibility is still alleged, unproven, and possibly untrue. This runs directly against the hardest possible evidence, i.e. Apple's own acknowledgement of what amounts to malpractice. The lead section devotes only a couple of sentences to that, the most important fact in the case. We should be fixing this gross and biased imbalance a.s.a.p. Suggestions? -The Gnome (talk) 07:31, 7 May 2026 (UTC)