Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a26db3fa087dc77b

Jump to content

Talk:Bath fire station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Secretlondon in topic POV

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:39, 6 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Bath fire station
Bath fire station
  • ... that the Art Deco Bath fire station is proposed for demolition with the only part to be saved being a stone crest?
  • Source: Offline, but quotation is: "just one feature will be retained, as 'the existing crest on the building will be reclaimed and repositioned near the new building entrance'" from: "Nooks and Corners". Private Eye. No. 1652. 27 June 2025. p. 22.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 924 past nominations.

Dumelow (talk) 09:35, 6 July 2025 (UTC).Reply

  • Taking a look at this article. Length - 5172 characters total, reasonable. Each source is carefully cited and free of plagiarism (one line is a direct quotation from the article). The sources themselves do check out and is free of bias. I recommend using ALT1 as the lead, because that makes the fire station a significant piece of work for women's history, it falls in line with the objectives of the WikiProject Women in Red initiative. I think this is a nicely written piece overall. I give it a in my book. NeverBeGameOver (talk) 21:15, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

POV

[edit]

The hook, and article, is heavily based on the advocacy of the Twentieth Century Society. It's not a listed building but they are arguing for it to be listed. We also use Private Eye's architecture column heavily, which I don't think should be used like this as it is advocacy and the opinion of the author as a columnist. Secretlondon (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2025 (UTC)Reply