Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25ceb8a78a48020

Jump to content

Talk:Barrie Trinder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

5x expanded by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 22:29, 15 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Barrie Trinder; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

    QPQ: No - Not done
    Overall: Good work, makes for easy DYK review! Actually created on June 8 and a week later the article was long enough to qualify for DYK. The Earwig similarty percentage for Ref. #2 is a bit high (27%) but it looks like that this is due to quoting of book titles.
    As for QPQ, the article was mostly written by User:Philafrenzy and this DYK was nominated by User:Philafrenzy, so the QPQ should also be done by User:Philafrenzy (the QPQ review was done by User:Whispyhistory). -- P 1 9 9   16:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

    Thank you for the review. As far as I know, the review can be done by any of the co-authors, or indeed donated by anyone, so I think the QPQ requirement is satisfied. (I think it was in return for working on Betty Clements.) Philafrenzy (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
    OK, good enough for me. -- P 1 9 9   03:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)Reply