Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24ffd8ade82eddd

Jump to content

Talk:Barrett-Jackson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No mention of troubles either

[edit]

They have had lots of legal issues lately, from suing a customer for defamation, to being sued by customers for a variety of reasons (stopping bidding on cars, forcing owners to buy back their own cars, etc). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.190.131 (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Barrett-Jackson 2005 or 2006?

[edit]

nostoc 17:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)Wasn't the description listed for the 2006 show (I remember the Futureliner but thought it sold for $4,000,000 even after some confusion about a bid for 4.1)? If so Alice Cooper was also there. If the text is from 2005, we should update it for the more recent show (imho).Reply

Perhaps it's worth dividing some of the sales records by year? Yes, the Futurliner was $4 mil even but this doesn't include commission costs. Yeah, $5 mil for Shelby's Cobra. Wow. fruitofwisdom 01:55, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

shelby's car! new record, 5 mill!!!!, someone update

"Prestigious"

[edit]

The word is used three times in the first four sentences. I am going to remove two of them, without debating whether it is truly an encyclopedic term. human 20:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Auction controversy?

[edit]

I expected some word here about Barrett-Jackson's auction at WestWorld on 27 January 2007 which embroiled the company and its owner, Craig Jackson, in controversy. Not a word in this article, which frankly reads like some kind of PR piece. Can anyone help provide a balanced perspective on this? -- SwissCelt 00:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Like any Wiki article, if you find something is wrong, write your own corrections and cite the sources. Anyway, there is a link to the Ramchargers lawsuit now. -- Jacob Poon 00:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob Poon (talkcontribs) {{{2}}}

Notability

[edit]

It is the most well-known automobile auction in the nation. 67.188.172.165 02:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Charity or Philanthropic Arm

[edit]

The first Barrett-Jackson auction was a fundraiser for local charities - is this still happening today? I watch the auction, see thousands of people with too much disposable income, and hope that there is still a philanthropic mission from Barrett-Jackson. While I understand that using this much disposable income to purchase a fancy car is considered an investment, and the bidders may personally donate to charities on their own, I really hope that Barrett-Jackson has continued the tradition of supporting local charities. Twomuch (talk) 02:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)--Twomuch (talk) 02:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Charity or Philanthropic Arm

[edit]

In 2007, Barrett-Jackson helped raise more than $4 million for local and national charities. http://www.barrett-jackson.com/media/presskits/PB07/other/Charity%20Post%20Event%20Release%20FINAL.pdf--Twomuch (talk) 02:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Too much like an ad,,,

[edit]

I've deleted parts on their Las Vegas sale, Insurance and memorbilia sections that read like advertsiments.

Example...when discussing the B-J brand of auto paints..."Check it out at www...." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bassetman4 (talkcontribs) 00:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Two sections on Scottsdale

[edit]

Does anyone know why there are two sections on Scottsdale results? Also, one shows the sale with buyer's premium and one shows without. 72Dino (talk) 01:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Barrett-Jackson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Edit Request: Add official VIP experiences provider

[edit]

Hello! I am a disclosed employee of Quint with a conflict of interest. I would like to request a minor, objective addition to the Barrett-Jackson page to note the official premium experiences partner. I propose adding this single, neutral sentence to the end of the existing **"Auctions"** or **"History"** section: "The company partners with Quint to operate Barrett-Jackson VIP Experiences, providing premium ticket, hospitality, and skybox packages for its collector car auctions."

Thank you to the volunteer editor who reviews and implements this factual corporate update! Lukestu (talk) 21:24, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done Per WP:NOTPROMO. Regards,  Spintendo  21:24, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply