Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Uanfala - thanks for creating this, it's much better than what was there before and is far preferable to a redirect. Just a question on the map - the article says that this is a language spoken in the Uttarkashi district, but the map is showing Bangani as a place with its pushpin. If Bangani is also a place where the language is spoken, the text ought to say so; otherwise, the map should probably show Uttarkashi rather than Bangani? Cheers GirthSummit (blether)13:53, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
The map isn't showing a settlement or a natural feature, but the location of the language itself (the zoom level is such that its area can reasonably be represented by a point). That's how pushpin maps work for languages (examples: Korlai Portuguese creole, Dalabon language, Kómnzo language); the label comes from the |name= parameter in the infobox. This is a relatively new feature of the infobox and I haven't seen any discussion of it so far. Do you think the pushpin should be labelled in a different way? – Uanfala (talk)14:28, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Uanfala, hmm. Language articles aren't something I'd super-familiar with, and I appreciate the point that a very small area can be represented by a pushpin, but for me if we're trying to show an area rather than a point I'd be expecting to see a little coloured zone on the map rather than a pushpin. Perhaps it would be better if there were to be a caption explaining what we're looking at. I also note that if you hover the cursor over the map, you get the alt text "Bangani is located in India", which is a bit weird - it ought to say something like "Bangani is spoken in India", but I'm not sure how to change that. GirthSummit (blether)15:37, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oh, I hadn't noticed the default alt text. I've just tweaked the infobox template so that it's now "Approximate location where <name> is spoken". That's not ideal either, but a more meaningful text can always be specified using |pushpin_map_alt=. As for a default caption, I'm not sure of the best way to do that, but I'll try to set |pushpin_caption= in this article. Now, showing the extent of the language area as a coloured zone would imply specifying the boundaries of this area, and that would require quite a bit more work (including digging in the literature for information that may not even be there) than simply passing a single set of coordinates for the rough location. Or did you mean that for this rough location we could use a different symbol from the little circle that comes with the current pushpin maps? – Uanfala (talk)16:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Uanfala, you make a good point about specifying the boundaries, I hadn't entirely thought that through. While there's always room for further improvement, I think that your changes are a big step forward and address my immediate concern, thank you. GirthSummit (blether)21:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)Reply