Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25304061e7f2780

Jump to content

Talk:Ban number

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Lurlock in topic Consonants

British/American English?

[edit]

Two difficulties: First, e.g. 101 is "one hundred one" in US English but "one hundred and one" in UK English. So it seems to be an aban number in the US but not in the UK. Second. 2 x 10^21 is "two sextillion" in short scale but "two thousand trillion" in long scale, so eban doesn't seem to be well-defined either. Presumably similar difficulties arise with the other ban number concepts. Should the article mention these.

Notability

[edit]

Is this concept notable? Richard Pinch (talk) 20:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Draft

[edit]

I've drafted a shorter version of this article at User:Accelerometer/Ban number. It condenses the article quite a bit. Thoughts? Accelerometer T / C 17:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Consonants

[edit]

What about the bban numbers, cban numbers, etc., banning consonants? GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

OEIS lists TBan numbers, but no other consonants that I can see. Many letter bans would of course be not very interesting as they do not occur much anyhow. For example, CBan numbers would be just all of the numbers until you hit the decillions. ZBan numbers would just be every number except zero. JBan and KBan would be all numbers since those letters never appear. More interesting ones might be LBan, NBan, RBan and SBan, which occur at fairly low values with enough regularity to be significantly different from other sequences. Lurlock (talk) 15:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply