Talk:Bakhmut
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bakhmut article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 30 December 2023
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request that in the country section Russia be added as(De facto) while Ukraine is put as (De jure) LegendaryChristopher (talk) 01:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}}template. Deltaspace42 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 December 2023 (UTC)- Institute of War Studies Map showing assessed Russian control far exceeds the boundries of Bakhmut city. Ergo, Russia has de facto control of the city. GaiusCaligulaPP (talk) 11:52, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Final sentence in lede
[edit]This is an edit request. Please change the final sentence in the lede from:
"The city was largely destroyed, with most of its population having fled, and what remained being placed under Russian occupation."
To:
"The city was largely destroyed, with most of its population having fled, and what remained was placed under Russian occupation.
This is in the interest of clarifying the grammar. JohnR1Roberts (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Alternatively, "The city was largely destroyed, with most of its population having fled. Those who remained were placed under Russian occupation." JohnR1Roberts (talk) 13:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
Why is there resistance to this article being updated?
[edit]As of the 31st of October 2025, it is beyond all possible dispute that Russia is in full control of the city of Bakhmut. It would seem wikipedia is indeed guilty of certain bias, and in this case preferring this article to be memory holed. Propaganda or falsehood by omission must not be allowed here, particularly when this website asks for donations championing itself as a source of fact. Would any editor with a grain of intellectual decency care to unlock this thread for appropriate updates? GaiusCaligulaPP (talk) 11:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- @GaiusCaligulaPP I do not believe there is any resistance to the article being updated. It has been locked to a certain editor level to avoid constant disruptive editing. Until you reach this level, you are welcome to propose any changes in the article backed up by WP:RS. Talk pages are not often monitored as extensively as main article spaces, so if you have not received any answer within a few days, you could try pinging a previously involved editor. Equine-man (talk) 11:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class Ukraine articles
- Low-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages


