Talk:Bad Milk
Add topicLatest comment: 5 months ago by Arconning in topic GA review
 | Bad Milk has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 22, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Bad Milk appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bad Milk/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Fox (talk · contribs) 07:27, 14 February 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 02:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Shall review. Arconning (talk) 02:11, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Fox Here'll be my review! Arconning (talk) 02:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Arconning: Thanks for taking this on!
Prose and MoS
[edit]Lead and infobox
[edit]- I did some minor edits here, let me know if you would like to revert them.
Background and development
[edit]- I did some minor edits here, let me know if you would like to revert them.
- Nevertheless, all good here.
Concept and gameplay
[edit]- Assuming "FMV" means full-motion video, the first mention of "full-motion video" should include a parentheses next to it staying "FMV" then using FMV from then on in the article.
- Done.
- First mention of "first person" within the body could use a wikilink.
- Done.
- "and often use reversed audio.", any source here or is it just within the game itself without needing any sourcing?
- I actually could not find an RS for this so I just removed it. It's evident from the game itself but I appreciate that's not good enough for GA!
Reception
[edit]- I did some minor edits here, let me know if you would like to revert them.
- Nevertheless, all good here.
Awards
[edit]- No major issues here... the table could use a header for accessibility for screen readers but that's a comment for an FAC review lol.
Images
[edit]- The cover art used in the infobox is relevant to the article and is under a proper license. All good here.
- A fair use image showing the game's gameplay could help the reader have a visual aid as a reference.
- I'll see what I can do; still images are not super indicative but perhaps something animated (or a sequence) could help.
References
[edit]- Earwig has a low enough percentage.
- Reference checks: 2, 3, 5, 10, 12. All good here.
- For reference number 5, you should make the archive link the main one as the original link is dead.
- I'm not totally sure what you mean by this ... I think this is the way the other references are as well?
- Ah, I see now, I just flipped the parameter to "dead". — Fox 23:00, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
Miscellaneous
[edit]- No ongoing edit war, broad enough information regarding the topic, neutral.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.