Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24c569968b6b5b3

Jump to content

Talk:Babel-17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2600:6C55:6D7F:BC1F:6C3C:947F:7302:A892 in topic Arrival

traitor

[edit]

How does the language turn the learner into a traitor?

From the very first sentence of the article on the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, which this articles in fact links to: "In linguistics, the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis (SWH) states that there is a systematic relationship between the grammatical categories of the language a person speaks and how that person both understands the world and behaves in it." 66.46.152.30 20:15, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

clarification

[edit]

come on you pikers. it is not that the language turns you into a traitor but that with no concept of self a person can have no conscience. 184.74.68.165 (talk) 19:43, 28 March 2011 (UTC)grumpyReply

Separate entry for language?

[edit]

Why is there a completely separate entry for the Babel-17 language? Shouldn't this simply be a section of the main article itself? Kdring 16:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

The same could be asked of any of the Fictional languages existing in this category. There may be a remaining question of relative notability. This seems at least as notable as Ascian language or Koalang given that the novel in question was a seminal and Nebula award winning work in linguistic SF. -- Rydra Wong 18:25, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm. Okay, good point. I guess it was just weird to see such an article when the main article itself is just a stub. Never mind. --Kdring 19:24, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Any relation to 1984?

[edit]

I'm surprised to see a novel dealing with how language influences thought and yet no mention of George Orwell's 1984. Is this not considered an influence on this book somehow? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.16.242 (talk) 01:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sapir-Whorf came before 1984, and the purposes of the languages are somewhat different -- Newspeak is designed to restrict and impoverish the range of thought, and remove much conscious deliberation from the act of speaking, while Babel-17 is designed to expand your perceptions (while shaping your worldview in the direction intended by the language designers). AnonMoos (talk) 13:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply


Play version

[edit]

Added mention of a play version of the book as it might be the first such adaption. With luck, it will see many more performances as it was done quite well. Hopefully, this is worth noting. Jsemmel (talk) 11:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Arrival

[edit]

The 2016 film Arrival also concerned protagonists changed by learning an alien language. Their perception of time changed as they learned how to interpret the strange symbols brought by the giant inky octopus people 2600:6C55:6D7F:BC1F:6C3C:947F:7302:A892 (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)Reply