Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24d10b59b306019

Jump to content

Talk:Babe Ruth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 days ago by Wehwalt in topic Babe Ruth and Japan
Featured articleBabe Ruth is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 11, 2014.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 31, 2006Good article nomineeListed
October 18, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
May 15, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 5, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
May 6, 2014Peer reviewReviewed
May 25, 2014Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 22, 2004, April 22, 2005, April 22, 2006, December 26, 2012, December 26, 2015, December 26, 2017, December 26, 2019, December 26, 2022, and December 26, 2025.
Current status: Featured article

Greatest of all time

[edit]

We had this discussion on Wilt Chamberlain, Michael Jordan in Basketball so i think it's fair to have it here.

Are you in favor of Babe Ruth's page calling him the greatest of all time, or should we make it "one of the greatest of all time"

Never17 (talk) 00:51, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Babe Ruth the 🐐 lol but in all seriousness to reach consensus for this article and any others you might want to change, I’d suggest posing this question in the talk page of Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 02:34, 19 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Note A follow-up discussion is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball § Babe RuthBagumba (talk) 13:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ruth's eye pain

[edit]

This article has long stated that Ruth suffered pain above his left eye, based on a medical source I don't have access to. It has recently been changed to "in" his eye followed by "behind" it, based on a PBS source. I am loathe to change text that relies on a medical source, based on a general source like PBS. Perhaps we should consult the Resource Exchange and see if we can obtain a copy of the medical source. Wehwalt (talk) 13:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

A review of the talk page archives reveals we discussed this matter in 2017, though regrettably the link to a copy of the article does not work for me. But you can see that specific language about the eye was asked for.--Wehwalt (talk) 13:07, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Wehwalt. I honestly believe you should go with what makes you happy. Wherever Ruth felt the pain, he felt it ... it's all about the wording the future writer comes up with, so I found a source instead. I admit, 'behind' the eye is a bit weird, 'above', I understand. I'm not going to tinker with this matter any longer. Maybe we'll all end on a good note here. Bringingthewood (talk) 21:59, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
It is not about making me happy. I'm approaching my 20th anniversary here and if what I suggest prevails, great, if not, I can live with that too. It's all about giving the reader the best possible content. That's what is important. Thanks for your understanding. Wehwalt (talk) 22:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
I figured as much right after I sent that last response. I did mean, 'making the article happy through you'. I wasn't going to edit myself, but I knew it was coming. I have a gift ... I manage to have people see things out of context after I express myself, lol. I do know what you mean and I thank you for understanding also. We'll probably catch up again one day. The best going forward. Bringingthewood (talk) 22:50, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
FWIW, the JADA article describes the pain in two ways: "intense left retro-orbital pain", and then later "pain around the eye". Nikkimaria (talk) 05:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:08, 9 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 12 August 2025

[edit]
23.128.224.93 (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Babe ruth hit his first professional home run in Toronto. The original post talks about intersquad game that wasn't an actual registered game.

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. meamemg (talk) 17:11, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Unnecessary jab at Helen Woodford

[edit]

In the personal life section, the inclusion of "unlike Helen" seems needlessly catty in this line: "Claire, unlike Helen, was well-travelled and educated, and put structure into Ruth's life"

(Also, I'm unfamiliar with the style guide here, but why aren't we using these women's last names to refer to them?)

She got cheated on then died in a fire, let's be nicer to her on Wikipedia ~2026-25841-09 (talk) 19:20, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

It's been removed. It is credited without link to Sports Center of December 26, 1999. This source was not in the FAC version of this article and I wonder how accurate or useful it is despite the fact it is used about a dozen times. Wehwalt (talk) 01:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Babe Ruth and Japan

[edit]

Did Babe Ruth and Japan ever reconcile? SkalgarXLR (talk) 22:42, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure what you mean. Wehwalt (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply