Talk:BT Group

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Thank you so much for taking the time to work through this! --Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:26, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

BT's complicity in clandestine GCHQ operations

Among the many documents released during the Edward Snowden revelations of 2013 it was revealed that BT and other telecommunication companies had been cooperating with GCHQ by deploying clandestine monitoring outposts in Oman and Yemen, among other things. Shouldn't these be included under the controversies heading? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark63424 (talk • contribs) 11:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Merge proposal

I can't see why this couldn't be slimmed down and absorbed into the main BT Group article. The other current divisions no longer have articles and this one doesn't warrant a full article. Cloudbound (talk) 17:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. Dormskirk (talk) 19:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
• Support Makes nonsense to keep these separate -OXYLYPSE (talk) 08:41, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Other divisional articles still do exist to be fair - it’s just not been moved from BT Enterprise to BT Business (which itself has an article that represents the previous, and now defunct, BT Business division). Josh (talk) 09:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Support – Can’t think of a good reason to keep these separate, especially when BT Enterprise, for example no longer exists. Adriazeri (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Now done: most of the material from BT Consumer was already duplicated in this article. Dormskirk (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

BTYSE?

is there anything here about BT Young Scientist and Technology Exhibition? forgive me if i skipped over it 2A06:5900:4003:3000:18D1:2218:CC74:D4A9 (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

@Girlrxtter 2A06:5900:4003:3000:18D1:2218:CC74:D4A9 (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

One Braham

Omission : the article appears not to say exactly where "One Braham" is. I think it is at 1 Braham St, London E1 8EE. ~2025-33385-20 (talk) 12:53, 15 November 2025 (UTC)