Talk:BLAKE (hash function)

Example Digests

Uhm, I am validating libsodium and b2sum (from blake2.net) and I do not get the same digest for "The quick brown dog jumps over the lazy fox" as indicated in this article. How was this derived, or is it wrong? If it's wrong I will happily update it.

I am deriving the aforementioned string as the following when using Blake2b with a 512 bit hash length: 40cb7aae36d87466bc7c6910baf00b994f0f985e3f3f8e8dec502f5159ccbffae84b1f5b582a3bf6829fe845382b7229c77c4f7270ee46ba971a39f1ea9eb772

Note: the empty string hash does appear to be correct. 167.21.41.12 (talk) 18:03, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

> Heh... a recent editor switched the words dog and fox. Cute. 167.21.41.12 (talk) 18:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

rotation constants

According to rfc 7693 the rotational constants for the 64bt versione are (32, 24, 16, 63) and not (32, 25, 16 ,11)

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7693#section-2.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.117.20.103 (talk) 03:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

> (32, 25, 16, 11) are rotational constants for 64-bit BLAKE. (32, 24, 16, 63) are rotational constants for 64-bit BLAKE2. I think that ideally the article should be split into two separate articles, because describing two different algorithms (BLAKE and BLAKE2) in the same article inevitably lead to confusion. TheInevitable (talk) 09:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

>> +1 to split articles. KMeyer (talk) 14:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

BLAKE3 released

https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3 77.13.14.89 (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)