Talk:BCT modernization
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Multimedia
[edit]"Multimedia" —Preceding unsigned comment added by ABCT Mod (talk • contribs) 17:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
BCT?
[edit]What is a BCT? There's not even a link to it. The opening is useless without basic background info. --A D Monroe III (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- I've linked Brigade combat team for clarity. Hohum (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Axed
[edit]The Class IV and a couple of UGV's got axed last week accoring to this. username 1 (talk) 17:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- This is evidenced by the army capabilitys page. The GCV lives on though.username 1 (talk) 18:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Advertisement tag
[edit]I've seen some tentative edits towards making this article more encyclopaedic, but it has a long way to go. I'll try to assist with this and suggest knowledgeable editors aggressively edit the article to remove the overwhelming U.S. Army POV. The army has plenty of venues to publicize unvarnished organizational views - Wikipedia should attempt to present information in a balanced fashion. W. B. Wilson (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- I took the liberty of removing this tag. There's barely any content to begin with. --Jprg1966 (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles