Talk:Auctorum
Add topicLatest comment: 10 years ago by Peter coxhead in topic What about "auct. s.lat."?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
What about "auct. s.lat."?
[edit]I encountered this in the following journal article title: Braun, Uwe; Shishkoff, Nina; Takamatsu, Susumu (2001). "Phylogeny of Podosphaera sect. Sphaerotheca subsect. Magnicellulatae (Sphaerotheca fuliginea auct. s.lat.) inferred from rDNA ITS sequences – a taxonomic interpretation". Schlechtendalia. 7: 45–52. Retrieved 10 August 2015. It's only used in the title and the abstract, and googling for this string has produced nothing useful. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 19:37, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
- auctorum sensu lato = in a wider/broader sense according to these authors Shyamal (talk) 05:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
- auct. was already a redirect; I've made s.lat. one as well. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)