Talk:Atlantics
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 1 month ago by RandomEditor6772314 in topic Reception too long
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reception too long
[edit]Critical reception section needs to be cut down for relevance. It is too long and superfluous, straying from WP guidelines & style. Momonowa (talk) 20:40, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- Interesting statement. Why don't you link and quote the exact quantified qualified guidelines that the article is supposedly "straying from"? Why don't you assert what exact length is "too long", or what was wrong with the style? Length is obviously never an argument for something being irrelevant. Also many of the quotes could easily be put into a Themes section, rather than Reception proper, so the issue isn't clearly superfluous irrelevance but a simple issue of sub-section placement.RandomEditor6772314 (talk) 02:01, 21 August 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class film articles
- Stub-Class French cinema articles
- French cinema task force articles
- Stub-Class Belgian cinema articles
- Belgian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Stub-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- Stub-Class AfroCreatives articles
- Unknown-importance AfroCreatives articles
- WikiProject AfroCreatives articles

